P. v. Brito
Appellant Jorge Benitez Brito contends that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because he was not advised there was a high probability he would be subject to mandatory deportation from the United States as a result of his convictions and would thereby lose his right to participate in reunification services ordered by a dependency court in reference to his daughter. Court disagree and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Comments on P. v. Brito