In re D.D.
David M. (father) appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights over his son, Z., who is now four and one-half years old. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 [providing for termination]; all further undesignated section references are to this code.) Father contends the juvenile court erred in denying, after a full evidentiary hearing, his modification petition seeking supervised custody of Z. and his half sister, D. D. or, in the alternative, increased visitation. ( 388.) Father also argues the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the benefit exception ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i) [former 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)]) to avoid terminating his parental rights. Finding no basis to overturn the trial courts conclusions, we affirm the order denying fathers modification petition and terminating his parental rights.
The juvenile courts order denying fathers modification petition and terminating parental rights is affirmed.
Comments on In re D.D.