In re James H.
Julie S. appeals from the termination of her parental rights to her four-year-old son, James H., at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]hearing (permanency hearing). Jamess father is not a party to this appeal. Julie argues the juvenile court should have applied the benefit exception to termination of parental rights ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Court find no error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re James H.