In re Kiefer G.
Kief G. appeals the juvenile courts order terminating parental rights to his son Keifer G., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26.[1] Appellant contends the juvenile courts order should be reversed on three grounds: (1) respondents efforts to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of a Native American family were inadequate under section 361.7; (2) respondent failed to show beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of Keifer by appellant is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child, pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (c)(2)(B)(ii); and, (3) appellant demonstrated that he maintained regular visitation with his son and that the minor would benefit from a continuing relationship with appellant, pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i). Court conclude the juvenile courts order terminating appellants parental rights is adequately supported by the record and therefore affirm.
Comments on In re Kiefer G.