Richard L. v. Super. Ct.
Richard L. (Father) petitions for an extraordinary writ directing the juvenile court to (1) enter an order requiring the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (the Department) to continue offering him reunification services;[1]and (2) vacate its order setting a hearing to consider terminating his parental rights to his son, T.L. (Welf & Inst. Code, 366.26).[2] (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452(a).) Father essentially contends the juvenile court erred by ordering that his reunification services be terminated because (1) substantial evidence does not support the courts finding that it would place T.L. at a substantial risk of detriment to return him to Fathers custody; and (2) the court did not state a factual basis for its finding that T.L. faced a substantial risk of detriment if placed in Fathers custody. Court deny the petition.
Comments on Richard L. v. Super. Ct.