Lane v. CalPERS
Appellant Richard R. Lane appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate and writ of administrative mandate entered in favor of respondent California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS). Lane seeks to require CalPERS to calculate his service retirement benefit by dividing his final compensation by seven and one half months, the period he actually worked, rather than 12 months. Court conclude that CalPERS has properly calculated Lanes retirement benefit in accordance with Government Code section 20035, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 20035(a)) and will affirm.
Comments on Lane v. CalPERS