Shivers v. Perret
After the divorce of appellant Francis Coyote Shivers (Shivers)[1]and respondent Laura Pauline Perret (Perret),[2]Perret told people, including a reporter for [as of Sept. 28, 2006],[3]that Shivers was abusive. Shivers sued Perret and her company, Pauley Go Lightly Productions, Inc. (Go Lightly). Perret and Go Lightly filed an anti-SLAPP motion, which was granted. On appeal, Shivers argues that Perrets statements did not fall within the scope of the anti-SLAPP statute. Court find no error and affirm.

Comments on Shivers v. Perret

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced