legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Pappas v. Seltzer
Appellant Bruce Seltzer appeals from the denial of his special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16)[1] a petition seeking an injunction prohibiting harassment pursuant to section 527.6 (Petition). The Petition was filed by Seltzers neighbors, Peter and Sophie Pappas (the Pappases), seeking to enjoin Seltzer from harassing them and their children based largely on allegations that Seltzer had deliberately driven his car in a menacing manner in the driveway shared by the Pappases and Seltzer. Court conclude that the trial court properly denied the anti-SLAPP motion because Seltzers alleged harassment is not protected conduct under the anti-SLAPP statute. Court thus affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale