legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Shih v. Lien
Appellants Eric W. Lien (Lien) and Pi-Ching Yen (Yen) (collectively, Lien/Yen) appeal from the trial courts April 5, 2006 order determining prevailing party status and awarding attorney fees and costs. The court designated respondents[1](collectively, Woo) as the prevailing party in the underlying contract dispute, and awarded Woo $440,000 in attorney fees and $13,224.22 in costs. Lien/Yen contend that the court erred by (1) concluding that this courts decisions in prior appeals in this matter limited the litigation proceedings the court could consider in determining the prevailing party, and (2) separating the litigation into two phases and determining a prevailing party for each phase. Court agree with Lien/Yens contentions, and reverse and remand to the trial court to determine the prevailing party, if any, based on the final results of the litigation as a whole and to award appropriate attorney fees.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale