In re H.M.
Ray M. (Father) appeals the jurisdictional and dispositional orders of the juvenile court that removed his daughter, H.M., from his custody and denied him reunification services. Father argues the courts jurisdictional findings that he sexually abused H.M. were based on unreliable hearsay, and the county family services agency failed to timely disclose to father exculpatory evidence that H.M. also made allegations of sexual abuse against another. Father also contends the court erred when it denied him reunification services under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(6) because the findings were not supported by substantial evidence. He argues the court abused its discretion when it conditioned Fathers right to visitation on his completion of sex offender therapy and his apology to H.M. Court affirm.
Comments on In re H.M.