Conservatorship of the Person of T.L.
deliberations, it responded to the jury's question about how to proceed due to its current 11-1 deadlock, by allowing the case to be reopened to permit the introduction of additional evidence. (People v. Funes (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1506, 1520(Funes); Horning v. Shilberg (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 197, 208-209(Horning).) The petitioner, the Public Conservator of the County of San Diego (petitioner), had previously prepared a chronology of placements in which T. L. had resided from 1997 to the present, and the court admitted that document as Exhibit 1 at trial in response to the jury's question, after discussions with counsel. As will be explained, the procedure used by the trial court was an appropriate exercise of discretion in light of the nature of the jury's question and the discussion with counsel. T. L.'s arguments on appeal are not well taken and the judgment will be affirmed.
Comments on Conservatorship of the Person of T.L.