legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Carmichael
This case returns to us for reconsideration in light of People v. Alford(2007) 42 Cal.4th 749 (Alford). Maile Carmichael appealed from convictions of possession for sale of methamphetamine, sale of methamphetamine and conspiracy. In our prior opinion (People v. Carmichael (Jan. 9, 2006, A106894), rev. granted May 10, 2006, transferred April 9, 2008), Court struck orders requiring appellant to pay restitution to the Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement for buy funds and to pay a court security fee. Following Alford,we now affirm the trial courts imposition of the security fee. The Supreme Courts decision in Alford does not affect our previous resolution of the restitution issue, to which Court adhere.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale