P. v. Borunda
Sean Andre Borunda appeals from judgment entered following the denial of his motion to suppress and his subsequent no contest plea to count 2, receiving stolen property (Pen. Code 496, subd. (a)).[1] He was sentenced to prison for the middle term of two years and contends the superior court violated the principles of stare decisis when it concluded that an officer need not be subjectively aware of a suspects parole status before searching him, and, as a result, erroneously denied appellants motion to suppress evidence of the methamphetamine found. For reasons stated in the opinion, Court reverse the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Borunda