legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Adrian A.
Regina A. and Andres A., the parents of Adrian A. and Andrew A., appeal the judgments terminating their parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 366.26. Regina's major contention is the juvenile court erred by allowing Adrian, who was then 11 years old, to testify by telephone at the section 366.26 hearing. Regina also contends the court should have granted her request to continue the hearing. Additionally, Regina claims the court erred by not finding the parent-child beneficial relationship exception to adoption. Andres contends there was insufficient evidence supporting the court's finding that Adrian and Andrew were likely to be adopted in a reasonable time. Andres, who is in prison, also contends his parental rights should not have been terminated because he did not receive court-ordered visitation.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale