legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bridges
Eddie Bridges appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of pandering by procuring a minor under the age of 16 (Pen. Code, 266i, subd. (b)(2)), pimping a minor under the age of 16 (id., 266h, subd. (b)(2)), pandering by procuring (id., 266i, subd. (a)(1)), and pimping (id., 266h, subd. (a)). He was sentenced to eight years in prison and contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, evidence of uncharged acts of misconduct should have been excluded, his request to relieve counsel was improperly denied, and his rights were violated when he was absent from the courtroom during a critical stage of the trial. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale