legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mermejo
Juan Jose Mermijo appeals from the judgment entered following an order revoking probation. Previously he pled no contest to shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (Pen. Code, 246) and admitted personal use of a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.5, subdivision (a). Pursuant to his negotiated plea, he was sentenced to prison for 17 years, execution of the sentence was suspended and he was placed on formal probation under certain terms and conditions, including that he serve 642 days in jail, with credit for 642 days. He contends the trial court erred when it imposed restitution and parole revocation fines of $3,400 and when it imposed a second security fee under Penal Code section 1465.8. For reasons stated in the opinion, we affirm the judgment and strike the restitution and parole revocation fines of $3,400 and the second security fee.
The $3,400 restitution and parole revocation fines and the second $20 court security assessment fee are stricken and in all other respects the judgment is affirmed. The superior court is directed to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment and forward it to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale