In re Alexandra P.
A father appeals from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights, and the mother joins fathers arguments in a separate appeal. Because the juvenile court did not give the parents notice of the requirement that they file an extraordinary writ petition from an earlier order terminating reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] hearing, they may seek review of issues arising from the earlier order in this appeal from the order terminating parental rights. Father claims that the trial court erroneously found that the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) provided reasonable reunification services and claims that the case plan itself was inadequate. We conclude, however, that Fathers failure to object in the juvenile court to the provision of reasonable services or to the adequacy of the case plan forfeits his objection on appeal. Court affirm the order terminating parental rights.
Comments on In re Alexandra P.