legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dicicco
A jury convicted Tony Dicicco of possession for sale of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) (Health & Saf. Code, 11378), and found true allegations that he was presumptively ineligible for probation based on the quantity of methamphetamine (Pen. Code, 1203.073, subd. (b)(2)). Dicicco admitted allegations he suffered a prior drug-related conviction and a strike prior conviction (Health & Saf. Code, 11370.2; Pen. Code, 667, subds. (b)-(i)), served three prior prison terms (Pen. Code, 667.5. subd. (b)), and committed the present criminal offense while on bail (Pen. Code, 12022.1, subd. (b)). Striking his prior prison convictions, the trial court sentenced Dicicco to a 10-year state prison term. On appeal, Dicicco contends the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for possession of methamphetamine for sale. He also contends the court prejudicially erred by instructing the jury with CALCRIM Nos. 2302 and 375. Court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale