Rubin v. Ross
Defendants contend plaintiffs failed to provide proper notice of their motion for terminating sanctions. Defendants also argue that, even if there was adequate notice, the trial court abused its discretion in imposing terminating sanctions rather than less severe sanctions. Court conclude notice was sufficient and there was no abuse of discretion in granting terminating sanctions due to defendants repeated obstruction of plaintiffs attempts to conduct discovery. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Rubin v. Ross