In re K.E.
Jacqueline and Kenneth E. appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights over six-year-old K.E. Kenneth argues the court erred in denying his request for a continuance and failing to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (See 25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) Jacqueline neither joins these arguments nor raises any of her own. Rather, she requests that her parental rights be restored if Kenneths arguments have merit. Court find the court justifiably denied Kenneths request for a continuance, but proper notice was not provided under the ICWA. Accordingly, Court reverse the judgment and remand the matter with directions for the trial court to ensure proper notice is given.
Comments on In re K.E.