P. v. Anguiano
Following his conviction by jury of possessing heroin for the purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11351), defendant Ocdulio Quintero Anguiano admitted that he had been convicted of first degree residential burglary within the meaning of the Three Strikes law and had served four prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, 459, 460, subd. (a), 667, subds. (b) through (i), 1170.12, subds. (a) through (d), 667.5, subd. (b).) He appeals, contending his admission that he had been convicted of first degree residential burglary must be aside because the trial court failed to inquire into the factual basis of his admission, as required by section 1192.5. Court conclude that the requirements of section 1192.5 do not apply to defendants admission, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Anguiano