legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Luers
Appellant Derek Luers committed a sex offense involving a minor and was sentenced to state prison. After serving his sentence, the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) determined that he met the criteria for treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) and recommended that he be confined to the Department of Mental Health (DMH) as a condition of parole. (Pen. Code, 2962.)
Appellant filed a petition requesting that the trial court overturn the determination of the BPH. ( 2966, subd. (b).) The trial court found that he met the statutory criteria beyond a reasonable doubt, certified him as an MDO and ordered him committed to the DMH. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court's finding that he represents a substantial danger of physical harm to others. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale