legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wise
Defendant Damon Wayne Wise was found guilty by a jury of attempted first degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211, 664; further statutory references are to this code), first degree burglary ( 459), assault with a deadly weapon ( 245, subd. (a)(1)) and elder abuse. ( 368, subd. (b)(1).) The jury also found allegations true that defendant knew or should have known the victim was age 65 or older ( 667.9, subd. (a)) and that he inflicted great bodily injury on a person age 70 or older. ( 368, subd. (b)(2), 12022.7, subd. (c).) Probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to a term of nine years in state prison, consisting of an upper term of four years for assault with a deadly weapon plus a five-year enhancement for inflicting great bodily injury. Pursuant to section 654, the court imposed but stayed sentences on the remaining counts.
Defendant appeals, claiming the trial court violated the prohibition against dual use of facts at sentencing and that his upper term sentence violated the holding in Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham). Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale