legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ward
A jury convicted Ronald David Ward of transporting more than 28.5 grams of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, 11360, subd. (a) (count 1)); possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11359 (count 2)); possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, 12021, subd. (a)(1) (count 3)); and having a concealed firearm in a vehicle (Pen. Code, 12025, subd. (a)(1) (count 4)). It also made a true finding on firearm allegations as to counts 1 and 2. The trial court sentenced Ward to three years in prison.
When Ward was arrested following a traffic stop, the police found marijuana in Ward's car and in his pocket. Ward's single contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by not giving a unanimity instruction to the jury, instructing that it must agree as to which stash of marijuana it was relying on to convict Ward of counts 1 and 2. As we will explain, we conclude that the trial court should have given a unanimity instruction with respect to count 2, but the error was harmless. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale