legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Allen
Defendant was convicted of attempted robbery and murder with special circumstances on the basis of testimony that, intending to take drugs and money, he barged into the home of a drug dealer and shot him. Defendant contends that (1) the prosecution dismissed jurors for racially discriminatory reasons, (2) the court erroneously admitted evidence of his commission of an uncharged robbery, (3) the court improperly struck his testimony when he refused to answer questions on cross-examination about an uncharged robbery, and (4) the jury committed misconduct. court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale