P. v. Ortiz
Defendant Isaac Ortiz appeals his conviction for multiple sexual offenses. He contends the court abused its discretion when it admitted preliminary hearing testimony given against him by a prior sexual assault victim in another case; that the prosecutor committed misconduct by citing facts not in evidence and making an improper gender-based appeal in her closing argument; and that his sentence violates Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [127 S.Ct. 856]. Court find these contentions to be meritless and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ortiz