Jerome D. v. Super. Ct.
Jerome D., the father of D.D., born June 2004 and Baby Boy D., born in March 2007, has filed a mandate petition pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.452. The father seeks to set aside an order scheduling a permanent plan hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Specifically, the father contends he complied substantially with the reunification plan managed by the Department of Children and Family Services (the Department). He argues he should be granted additional time to complete the reunification plan pursuant to section 361.5, subsection (a). Court deny the petition.
Comments on Jerome D. v. Super. Ct.