Violet Realty v. County of Riverside
Plaintiff Violet Realty, Inc. (Violet) filed suit against the County of Riverside (the County) and Chicago Title, seeking to set aside a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of Violets 10-acre property in Romoland. The sale was conducted pursuant to a trust deed securing a note in the principal sum of $500,000, which Violet originally executed in favor of the County in 1990. Chicago Title acted as trustee and conducted the sale. In May 2002, the County took title to the property pursuant to the trustees deed. Court affirm. Corut conclude there are no triable issues of material fact and the FAC is indeed barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Our conclusion is based on the allegations of Violets current FAC, the allegations of its prior complaint against the County in the 1992 action, and the dismissal of that action, with prejudice. Court further conclude that Violets motion to file a second amended complaint was properly denied.
Comments on Violet Realty v. County of Riverside