P. v. Durden
Defendant and appellant Anthony Maurice Durden appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction for furnishing or giving away cocaine base. Durden was sentenced to a prison term of 14 years.
Durden contends the trial court: (1) erred by admitting prejudicial evidence; (2) erroneously failed to give CALCRIM No. 224, regarding circumstantial evidence; (3) abused its discretion by denying his posttrial motion for disclosure of confidential juror information; and (4) miscalculated his custody credits. Court correct Durdens custody credits as requested. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Durden