legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Coleman
Eugene Coleman pled guilty to unlawfully selling methamphetamine, and the court imposed a three-year prison sentence. On appeal, Coleman contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence resulting from his telephone conversation with an undercover police officer. Coleman argues the conversation violated the Federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2510 et seq.), and constituted an unconstitutional warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment. Court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale