legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Flynt v. JAC Capital Fund
L. Flynt, Ltd.-8484, Inc. (Flynt) sued JAC Capital Fund, LLC (JAC) for breach of promissory note and attached a $1 million payment owed to JAC by Finova Capital Corporation (Finova). The trial court found that the $1 million belonged to third party claimants David Litt and Teresa Litt, cotrustees of the David and Teresa Litt Family Trust, and Litt Mortgage, Inc. doing business as Select Mortgage (collectively the Litts) because they held prior assignments from JAC of the right to receive that sum. Flynt appeals, arguing that the assignments were invalid on two grounds: the Litts did not receive them in good faith because they knew that Finovas consent was required but not obtained, and because the assignments were not supported by sufficient consideration. Court disagree and therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale