legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Arturo E.
Appellant Yvonne A. (mother) appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to Arturo E. (Arturo), born April 2005. She contends that the juvenile court erred in (1) denying her petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388,[1]and (2) finding that the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A)[2]exception to termination of parental rights did not apply. Court conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying mothers section 388 petition. She failed to demonstrate a change of circumstances and that returning Arturo to her care was in his best interests. Likewise, substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts finding that the contact and benefit exception to the termination of parental rights did not apply.
Accordingly, the juvenile courts orders are affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale