legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Hector G.
Hector G. and Ruby G. (together the parents) appeal an order terminating their parental rights to their son, Hector G. (hereafter, the minor), and Ruby appeals an order summarily denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition.[1] Hector contends the court violated his right to due process by terminating his parental rights without sufficient notice and without a special hearing regarding parental unfitness. Ruby asserts the court erred by denying her petition without a hearing and by finding the beneficial parent child relationship and the sibling relationship exceptions to termination of parental rights and adoption did not apply. Hector joins in Ruby's arguments which may be to his benefit. Court affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale