legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jacob R.
Daniel R. (Daniel), who is the alleged father of Jacob R., appeals from the order terminating his parental rights[1]under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[2] Daniel contends notice of the proceedings was not given as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (the ICWA) (92 Stat. 3069, 25 U.S.C. 1901-1963). Respondent Department of Children and Family Services (the Department) argues Daniel lacks standing to challenge notice under the ICWA. Court agree Daniel has no standing to assert the issue, because he is an alleged father who took no official action to acknowledge or establish his paternity. Accordingly, Court dismiss the appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale