Estate of Hiebert
Executor Edwin Pyle appeals from a judgment entered against him after the superior court sustained respondent Jerry E. Henrys demurrer to Pyles third amended complaint. The superior court concluded: The plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action for fraud. Specifically, plaintiff has not adequately alleged damages from defendants allegedly fraudulent conduct. Pyle contends that the superior court erred in concluding that his third amended complaint failed to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action for fraud. As Court explain, Court agree with appellant and reverse the judgment.
Comments on Estate of Hiebert