legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McQuarters
Defendant was placed on Proposition 36 probation after pleading no contest to possession of heroin. Less than five months later, he was arrested after he was found in possession of recently stolen property and charged with violating the conditions of his probation. The trial court found defendant had violated his probation and sentenced him to the mitigated term for the drug possession offense. Defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred in failing to order the preparation of a supplemental probation report in connection with the probation violation, (2) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he had received stolen property, (3) the court failed to exercise its discretion to consider reinstating defendants probation, and (4) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale