P. v. Bynum
Anthony Bynum was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code,[1] 12021, subd. (a)(1)), with the special allegation found true that he had served two prior prison terms within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). On appeal, Bynum argues that the Court of Appeal should review the in camera proceedings conducted by the trial court pursuant to Bynums motion for production of documents under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess) and Evidence Code section 1043; that his conviction should be reversed because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his constitutional rights before admitting his prior convictions; and that the trial court committed sentencing error. Court affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Bynum