P. v. Pearson
On appeal from a jury verdict, defendant Wesley Alex Pearson argues the trial court should have stayed the sentence on his conviction for corporal injury to a cohabitant, as well as the sentence on the related great bodily injury enhancement, pursuant to Penal Code section 654. Defendant also contends the trial court violated his constitutional right to a jury trial by imposing upper term sentences based on facts not found true by a jury. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Pearson