Saben, Earlix & Assoc. v. Fillet
William J. Davis (Davis) and Davis & Company (the Company) filed two motions for attorney fees, claiming they were entitled to fees as prevailing parties under certain contracts, and based on the rationale of Flannery v. Prentice (2001) 26 Cal.4th 572. The court denied their motions. Davis and the Company appeal, contending that the court erred on several grounds. Court affirm.

Comments on Saben, Earlix & Assoc. v. Fillet

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced