P. v. Camarena
Defendant Michael Camarena (Michael) challenges his conviction for possession of heroin (Pen. Code, 11350, subd. (a)). His sole contention on appeal is the trial court erroneously excluded two hearsay statements made by his father, David Camarena (David). Michael contends Davids hearsay statements were admissible under Evidence Code section 1230 as declarations against penal interest. Court conclude the court erroneously excluded Davids statements, but the error was harmless. Accordingly, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Camarena