P. v. Sandoval
Alejandro Sandoval was convicted of controlled substance and firearms offenses. On appeal, he contends that the admission of evidence of a prior instance of possession and sales of narcotics and a weapon violated Evidence Code section 1101 and the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; that the evidence of the prior acts should have been excluded under Evidence Code section 352; that CALCRIM No. 375 violated his due process rights by creating an improper permissive inference; and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sandoval