legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Janet G. v. Superior Court
Janet G. (mother) and Guillermo G. (father) separately petition for extraordinary relief from a juvenile court order terminating reunification services and scheduling a permanency planning hearing for their child, Jorge. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) Both parents challenge the juvenile courts finding that they failed to make substantive progress in their reunification plans. They contend the child should have been returned to their custody under a family maintenance plan because they ameliorated . . . serious problems that led to Jorges removal from the home. Real party in interest Sonoma County Human Services Department opposes the petitions. Court deny the petitions for extraordinary relief on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale