P. v. Hidalgo
After hearing evidence that appellant had a blood alcohol level of 0.17 percent, a jury convicted appellant of driving under the influence of alcohol and of driving while having a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher. The jury initially deadlocked on another charge of possessing a dirk or dagger, but ultimately convicted him of that charge. On appeal, Hidalgos counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, stating that no arguable issue exists. Court have independently reviewed the record, find no arguable issue, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hidalgo