P. v. Satterfield
A jury convicted defendant Joshua Thomas Satterfield of second degree robbery and the trial court found true that defendant had suffered a prior serious felony for purposes of the Three Strikes law and a prior prison term for purposes of a one-year sentence enhancement. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his (1) request to challenge photographic lineup identifications outside the presence of the jury, (2) request for discovery of a witnesss medical records, and (3) motion for a new trial grounded upon jury misconduct and a lack of jury unanimity. In a separate petition for writ of habeas corpus, which we ordered considered with the appeal, defendant raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel grounded on trial counsels withdrawal and failure to renew a motion for mistrial. Court disagree with defendants appellate claims and affirm the judgment. Court also dispose of the habeas corpus petition by separate order filed this day.
Comments on P. v. Satterfield