In re R.R.
Raymond R. appeals from 2007 orders terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his three year old daughter and one year old son.[1] He seeks reversal on three grounds. One, he contends the court erred in 2006 when it determined that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. 1901, et seq.) did not apply. Two, he argues the court should have selected legal guardianship as the childrens permanent plan due to their relative caregivers preference for legal guardianship over adoption. Three, appellant urges evidence of a positive relationship between the parents and the children added to the weight the court should have placed in favor of legal guardianship. On review, Court affirm.
Comments on In re R.R.