P. v. Haynes
Alvin Haynes appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for receiving stolen property (felony) and resisting a police office (misdemeanor), for which he received a total prison term of six years (double the upper term of three years for the felony).[1] He attacks the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction for resisting a police officer, and further contends the court abused its discretion in failing to consider relevant mitigating circumstances in sentencing him to the upper term. Court find no error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Haynes