In re Erin R.
Minor Erin R.s nondependent brother, Richard R., appeals from the denial of his petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1] for home visits with Erin in the home he lives in with Erins father (Father). Fathers parental rights as to Erin had been terminated in 2005. The juvenile court denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing, based on briefs and declarations filed by Richard, the Sonoma County Human Services Department (the Department), and Erins counsel. Richard and Erins appellate counsel contend that the trial court erred in not requiring an evidentiary hearing. Court find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm the juvenile courts orders.
Comments on In re Erin R.