P. v. Maurice M.
On June 12, 2007, an original juvenile petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602, subd. (a)) was filed against appellant Maurice M. alleging that he committed a felony: operating a motor vehicle with intent to evade a police officer (Veh. Code, 2800.2, subd. (a));[1]and two misdemeanors: reckless driving causing bodily injury (Veh. Code, 23104, subd. (a)) and driving without a license (Veh. Code, 12500, subd. (a)).
A contested jurisdictional hearing was held on July 3, 2007. After the close of the prosecution case, the court denied appellants motion under Welfare and Institutions Code section 701.1 to dismiss the petition. Following the conclusion of all the evidence and argument by counsel, the court sustained the allegations of the petition.
At the dispositional hearing on July 31, 2007, the court declared appellant a ward of the court and placed him on in-home probation. He was permitted to reside with a relative of his mother in Vancouver, Washington. Probation conditions included, among other items, a 6:00 p.m. curfew and completion of anger management classes. Appellant received a maximum confinement time of three years four months. Appellants counsel has advised us that her examination of the record has revealed no arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel has advised her client in writing that a Wende brief was filed and that he had the right to personally file a supplemental brief in this case within 30 days. No such supplemental brief was filed. Court agree that the record reveals no arguable issues and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Maurice M.