legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Emilee T.
In this appeal from the denial of appellants request for a declaration of paternity and visitation rights with the minor Emilee,[1]he claims that a prior judgment which declared his status as the biological father of the minor must be given binding, conclusive effect in this dependency proceeding to grant him visitation rights with the minor. He also claims that a violation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq., hereafter the ICWA) occurred. We conclude the judgment that declared appellant to be the biological father of Emilee does not rebut the presumption of paternity in Shawn, the step-father of the minor, and does not entitle appellant to visitation rights in this proceeding. Court also find no violation of the ICWA. Court therefore affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale