legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Kylie O.
Sharon T. appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights to Kylie O. Sharon argues the court erred in failing to apply either the parental bond exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 (c)(1)(A)) or the sibling bond exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 (c)(1)(E)) to the general presumption favoring adoption as the permanent plan for a dependent child, once reunification efforts have failed. court conclude that where, as here, the child was taken from the mothers custody at birth, and never resided with either the mother or the siblings, there is no basis to conclude the court abused its discretion in declining to apply either exception. The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale